Abortion:
anything but the truth
By Paul Schratz
Suppose you were asked to organize a symposium on the Canadian
health-care system. You'd probably look for speakers who would
address the weaknesses of the current system, some defenders, as
well as someone who believes there's a place for more privatized
care. In short, you'd try to pull together a diverse range of
viewpoints.
It would probably come as a surprise, then, to learn that when the
University of Toronto Faculty of Law put together a symposium to
mark the 20th anniversary of the Morgentaler decision, and entitled
it "Reflections on the Judgement and Abortion in Canada Today," not
one of the 20 scheduled speakers addressed the problematic elements
of abortion.
In short, it wasn't a symposium, it was a rally, replete with an
abortion provider explaining why he does his job, a pro-abortion
journalist, representatives of abortion clinics and groups, and on
and on.
Abortion remains a subject many Canadians wish would just go away,
while many others want to see it receive more attention.
In between are the majority of Canadians who don't realize abortion
remains an issue, which sure makes it obvious that those who want
more public debate on abortion have got the better argument.
Sadly, those who want the topic to go away will seemingly say
anything to get their way. In last week's Globe and Mail, a debate
of sorts took place between ethicist Margaret Sommerville, known for
her cogent pro-life arguments, and the Globe's health columnist.
It was a slam dunk. Sommerville's impeccable logic addressed every
major reason why more abortion debate is necessary.
The pro-abortion argument, on the other hand, was an emotional rant
strewn with falsehoods. One quote: Canada's Supreme Court has "ruled
that the state has no place in the uteruses of the nation...."
In fact, the Supreme Court said the opposite: that protection of
fetal interests by Parliament is "a valid governmental objective."
On both sides of the border, historic abortion decisions are getting
abundant attention. It's the 20th anniversary of the Morgentaler
decision here, and the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade in the U.S.
In that country, the nation is a supreme court justice away from
overturning Roe v. Wade, the highly contentious ruling that relied
on a litigant who was manipulated and has since retracted her story.
Just last week a quarter of a million people turned out for the
annual March for Life, a figure reduced to "thousands" in most media
accounts.
In Canada, even major, pro-abortion media are marking the
Morgentaler anniversary and assessing the decision, reopening a
debate that makes most abortion supporters queasy. In addition,
while the government has no plans to introduce legislation to
restrict abortion, it's not obstructing initiatives to recognize
fetal rights, such as when the unborn are victims of violence
against their mothers.
The momentum is building. As prenatal technology improves, as
society becomes more aware of what that "clump of flesh" actually
looks like, and as more young people embrace the Culture of Life
that Pope John Paul II called them to, expect to see "pro-choicers"
forced to make more use of totalitarian means as their sole tool for
trying to win the debate.
Expect it, but pay no heed to it. The fact is, we could be within a
lifetime of reaching the day when our children or grandchildren look
back on this time with disbelief.
* * * * *
In most parishes, the annual collection for the Catholic Press will
be taken up Feb. 3. Please be generous. Please be more than
generous. Your donation to this collection goes directly to your
pastor to help offset his costs in mailing The B.C. Catholic to your
home.
We're mailed to about 19,000 families a week, and many of those
families receive their subscription because they contributed to this
collection and were automatically placed on their parish's
subscription list.
Please let your parish know that you'd like to receive The B.C.
Catholic. Then slip a generous donation into the Feb. 3 collection.
Many thanks.
"Catholics are encouraged to read Catholic publications
regularly.... It is hard to see how people can keep in touch with
what is happening in the Church without the Catholic Press. Neither
can people keep a Catholic attitude towards what happens in the
world without the help of commentaries on the news written in the
light of Christian principles." (Pastoral Instruction for the
Application of the Decree of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council
on the Means of Social Communication, 1971, No. 140).
|
Comment on the article above using this form...
|
|