Sacrament of Holy Eucharist has matter and form
Msgr. Pedro Lopez-Gallo
By perennial tradition, the essential elements of the Eucharist are
bread, made from wheat only, and the natural wine from grapes. In
theological terms, this is called the "matter." The "form" is the
words of consecration: "Eat, This is My Body. Drink, This is My
Blood."
To be valid, each sacrament needs these two elements: the form and
the matter. In baptism the water is the matter, the form is the
words: "I baptize you" while invoking the Trinitarian Godhead. In
confirmation, the matter is the anointing with sacred chrism on the
forehead and the form is the words: "Be sealed with the gift of the
Holy Spirit," and so on for the other sacraments.
The Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke relate
quasi-verbatim the scene of the Institution of the Eucharist: "As
they were at table, Jesus took bread. He broke it and gave it to His
disciples, saying, `Take It and eat It; This is My Body.' He then
took the cup and gave it to them, saying, `Drink, all of you; This
is My Blood'" (Mt. 26:26-29, Mk. 14:22-25, Lk. 22:17-20).
The narratives of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are so alike that they can
in many passages be placed side by side and viewed at a glance. The
three are called Synoptic Gospels because they present a synopsis or
same view of the events.
The Church wants to strictly conserve what Jesus Himself did and
commanded at the Last Supper, and so requires that in the Latin rite
the bread be unleavened, similar to the bread of the Passover.
Although the Church has never changed this traditional matter and
form, for practical reasons two exceptions have been allowed. The
first concerns those suffering from celiac disease, a genetically
predisposed nutritional condition caused by an inability to digest
gluten, a constituent of wheat; they become quite ill from ingesting
even traces of gluten.
Communion can be given to persons with such a condition under the
form of wine. Since 1967 bishops can allow those unable to receive
Communion under the species of bread to receive it under the species
of wine alone. This permission became general under the new Code
issued in 1983 (canon 925).
The second exception is regarding the wine that must be from the
"fruit of the vine," natural and pure, unmixed with anything else.
With the permission of the Holy Father, chronic alcoholics are
permitted to use "must," the expressed juice of grapes before
fermentation. Theologians and canonists consider the unfermented
grape juice valid, but its use is gravely forbidden except in cases
of necessity, and only with Vatican authorization.
This consideration is provided to any priest or person who may be
afflicted with alcoholism or some other condition wherein consuming
even a minimal quantity of consecrated wine could have harmful
effects.
It would be a grave sin, even under extreme necessity, for a priest
to consecrate the bread without the wine, or even to consecrate both
outside the celebration of the Mass.
The Church allows the distribution of the Eucharist under both
species in a variety of ways: one minister may give the Body of
Christ while another offers the chalice. In my parish, I prefer to
do it by "intinction": the priest takes the Sacred Host, dips it
into the chalice containing the Precious Blood, and puts it on the
tongue of the communicant. In this way, contact of the chalice with
saliva and germs is avoided.
Communion under the two species is highly recommended especially on
Holy Thursday, on the Feast of Corpus Christi (the Feast of the Body
and Blood of Christ), during the sacramental ceremony of marriage
for newlywed spouses, and on significant anniversaries.
Let me say a few words about the problem of priests being asked to
participate with a minister of another denomination in a mixed
marriage. Although the ecumenical movement has made huge progress,
Catholic priests are still prohibited from concelebrating the
Eucharist with priests of churches which are not in full communion
with Rome (canon 908). It is also not acceptable for the two clerics
to jointly perform the wedding ceremony.
The rule is: if the wedding is performed in a Catholic church, the
other minister who assists, be he Sikh, Muslim, or Protestant, must
be treated as a lay person. He can proclaim one of the readings or
be one of the official witnesses, but may not officiate with the
Catholic priest or share in the exchange of matrimonial vows.
Likewise, if permission and dispensation has been obtained from the
bishop for the Catholic to marry outside a Catholic Church, and if
the ceremony takes place in a synagogue or any other place of
worship, the Catholic priest can only participate as if he were a
lay person as a reader or as a legal witness, but there should not
be two homilies or a mingling of the matrimonial vows by the two
clerics.
Msgr. Lopez-Gallo's columns are available in two volumes for $20
each from St. Andrew's Church Supply, 305 W. 8 Ave. in Vancouver,
toll-free 1-800-663-7161. Proceeds will go to Hogar de Nazareth
Orphanage in Mexico, which he sponsors.
|
Comment on the article above using this form...
|