Celibacy is for the sake of His people
By Msgr. Pedro Lopez-Gallo
In 1563, during the 24th session of the Council of Trent, all the
questions regarding the priestly celibacy were studied. Theologians
and canonists expressed their contradictory opinions and arrived at
these conclusions:
First, celibacy is the best condition for God’s service in the
ministry. A married minister is too preoccupied with his wife and
family to give such service.
Second, the priesthood, even in the Old Testament, requires a form
of sanctity that implies the curbing of carnal desires. In the Old
Covenant, priests were obliged only to a limited time of worship,
but today’s priests should be totally and perpetually consecrated to
God.
Their conclusion was that, even if in other rites marriage was
possible before ordination, marriage and priesthood were
incompatible. While good in itself, marriage rendered one unfit for
the ministry.
Some of the theologians said that in consequence of this, celibacy
for a priest was a duty based on divine law.
Others claimed that clerical celibacy was required only by
ecclesiastical law, that it was only by the will of the Church that
a priest was unable to contract marriage, and therefore, despite the
suitability of celibacy for the sacerdotal state, the Pope might
fundamentally dispense from this law that is only ecclesiastical.
The Council discarded the opinion that celibacy was of divine law.
It said the Church had the right to prohibit priests from marrying
and rejected the claim that celibacy was impossible. The grace of
God would be sufficient to reinforce the priests in their resolve.
The current position of the Church today is that clerical celibacy
is most proper to the sacerdotal ministry; it is, in no sense, a
deprecation of marriage, but it is the condition for greater freedom
in the service of God. The law of celibacy is of ecclesiastical
origin and may be abrogated by the Church.
In the early Church, and in the East, ordination of married men as
bishops, priests, and deacons was permitted for good reasons. Recent
Popes have found similarly good reason to dispense from celibacy in
the case of married Protestant pastors who convert and desire
ordination.
Celibacy does not enjoy a very good image in our society these days,
but if we consider it as an expression of faith, we must admit such
dedication to God is worthy. It requires people whose belief in the
Church is integral. Celibacy is a charism in, of, and for the
Church.
It is ironic that the strongest advocates of optional celibacy are
not priests (save some exceptions) but secular people, especially
non-Catholics. It is more absurd that many of them ignore the fact
that if the Vatican were to make celibacy optional, it would apply
only to diocesan priests of Latin rite, not to religious priests,
who on joining their religious orders took vows of obedience,
poverty, and chastity.
For a local example, if the Vatican were to make celibacy optional
the pastor of St. Jude’s Parish could exercise his option to marry,
but all the priests of St. Helen’s, Our Lady of Sorrows, and Our
Lady of Perpetual Help Parishes could not, because they are
religious. In Vancouver there are 180 priests, of whom 92 are
religious and 88 diocesan.
The Vatican Statistics Office says the number of priests worldwide
at present is 405,891. More than 50 per cent belong to religious
orders and have taken a vow of chastity.
It would not be a spectacularly large number of priests who could
take advantage of any new rules allowing them to marry. Only half of
the present priests, those not in religious orders, could even
consider that option.
The majority of the remaining half are approaching or beyond what is
considered their “senior” years. It is unlikely that now, after
having willingly and joyfully dedicated their whole lives in
celibacy and chastity to the service of God, they would want to
assume the worries and responsibilities of marriage in their sunset
years.
Some people say the option would be only for the future, and for the
younger priests. This seems to be secular thinking, a mirage,
pretending that young priests want to marry, or that there would be
more vocations if marriage was allowed.
The majority of priests feel disappointed and insulted when people
assume they know what priests want. They say, “Why do people want us
to give up something so enriching that is given to us though our
ordination?”
In my experience, I can assure you, young priests are proud of their
celibacy, by which they have consecrated the fullness of themselves
to the service of God and to their parishioners. It must also be
noted that neither in our Eastern Rite, which permits marriage
before ordination, nor in Protestant religions, whose ministers are
married, is the number of priests or ministers larger than in the
Catholic faith.
Contrary to common opinion, a celibate priest is not supposed to
live in isolation. That would be as pointless as expecting that a
husband live in isolation from his wife. Celibacy is not to show the
parishioners how to live alone, but to facilitate their living
together as God’s children.
Celibacy is a gift of the Spirit that invites a priest to be
accessible to his people. In fact, celibacy is ultimately for the
sake of His people and the building up of the Church.
Msgr. Lopez-Gallo’s columns are available in two volumes for $20
each from St. Andrew’s Church Supply, 275 E. 8 Ave., Vancouver, V5T
1R9, or toll-free at 1-800-663-7161. Proceeds will go to Hogar de
Nazareth Orphanage in Mexico, which he sponsors.