Cloning bill falls short:
bishops
|
|
|
Other stories appearing in this week's paper:
-
Columbus Charities launches seniors project
-
Pro-lifers question ‘15 years of choice’
-
Synod reaches the halfway point
-
Friar of Atonement remembered
-
Msgr. Lopez-Gallo receives Queen’s Jubilee medal
-
Richmond farmer and humanitarian is mourned
-
Ongoing debt publicity frustrates Victoria bishop
-
Writing a prescription for Catholic health care
-
And many, many more...
To read them all, subscribe to The B.C.
Catholic
|
By ART BABYCH
OTTAWA (CCN) — The bishops conference continues to press for changes to
long-awaited legislation dealing with cloning, embryonic stem cell research,
and other new reproductive technologies even as Parliament inches closer to
passing the controversial bill.
In a statement Jan. 29, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB)
urged MPs to strengthen the bill by amending it to prohibit research on
human embryos. “By giving the green light to research on embryos who remain
after fertility treatments, Bill C-13 fails to protect the human embryo,”
the statement said.
“The problem with embryonic stem-cell research is that while the research
has the potential to benefit those living with disease, it actually harms
the embryo, who dies in the process. Ultimately, the embryo is exploited for
the benefit of others.”
The CCCB statement also supports the bill’s prohibitions on animal/human
hybrids, germ-line alteration, and on commercial surrogacy, but calls for
strengthening its ban against human cloning to ensure that it “captures all
forms and possibilities of cloning.” (For more on C-13 see Page 14.)
As the bill proceeds through third reading, “we pray that Members of
Parliament will be given the wisdom and the grace to do what is best for
those now living and for those to come,” said the bishops.
Debate on third reading of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act opened in
the House of Commons Jan. 28, about 10 years after the release of a royal
commission report on new reproductive technologies. The government is hoping
for speedy passage even though more than 100 amendments have been proposed,
mainly by the Canadian Alliance, the official opposition party.
The bill fails to assert the sanctity of human life, said Canadian
Alliance MP Jason Kenney during debate. As well, it “clearly fails to assert
the inviolable dignity of the human person,” and “fails to attribute to
nascent human life, embryonic human life, the clear status of human life,
let alone of personhood,” he said.
Kenney added that the legislation is founded on weak principles “which
will lead to weak application of the law if passed.”
None of the parties in the Commons are opposed to banning human cloning.
“There is almost a 300 per cent failure rate for any individual cloned,”
said Canadian Alliance MP Rob Merrifield. “That means 300 human lives would
be sacrificed for one healthy clone.”
Bloc Quebecois MP Real Menard said members of his party “are aware of the
urgency of this matter and we realize that we must prohibit cloning for
reproductive purposes as quickly as possible.” The BQ is unhappy that the
regulatory agency will have an annual budget of $10 million, he said.
Jocelyne Girard-Bujold, another BQ member, said, “As a woman, I think
that human conception begins when a sperm and an egg meet. I am very
religious and, according to my principles, human beings are created by God.”
Progressive Conservative MP Elsie Wayne said every member should stand up
and say that they will not allow embryonic stem-cell research but will allow
adult stem cell research. “We will agree to that,” she said. “However no way
will we take the life of a child for research.”
Former Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day said the issue of research
on embryonic stem cells is “an ethical and moral dilemma which confronts,
bothers, and troubles many Canadians.” He said the controversy could have
been avoided “simply by saying that research and development in this area
would be focussed on non-embryonic cells.”
Liberal MP Hedy Fry called the legislation “extraordinary,” adding, “It
is the first time that we are setting guidelines and regulations for very
important and ground-breaking research.”
She said research should not be inhibited but that it should not be
allowed to “carry on galloping at a pace without any regulations and without
any way of defining the guidelines within which that research will take
place.”
Fry said the bill seeks to set ethical regulations and guidelines that
would frame the research.
Draft legislation on assisted human reproductive technologies has been
introduced in the House of Commons twice in the past seven years but on both
occasions died when the sessions of Parliament were prorogued.
More on Bill C-13...
|
Comment on the article above by
using this form...
|